this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
1113 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

11253 readers
5640 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1113
He did though. (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
(page 2) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Hahaha ๐Ÿ™ƒ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ˜–๐Ÿ˜ญ

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, he does have a point though. #OpenAccess

Footnote: Yeah, I saw that he had done some bad faith research, but remember open access is for everyone in the world, not just free rider corporate shills.

Footnote 2: If it is not feasible to go for gold OA journals, please go for green route: publish in closed but allows authors to put it up on preprint like arXiv.

[โ€“] Sanyanov 2 points 11 months ago

As a person who just paid a fuckton of money to publish in open access (literally half an hour ago), that HURTS.

Open Access is good, but first we have to abolish an entire publisher industry that lays insurmountable costs - either on readers or researchers themselves. Their work is not remotely worth that money. By making it a public good, we can cut down on so much unnecessary expenses.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ