this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
480 points (99.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44283 readers
1449 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nyakojiru 2 points 2 years ago

Corporations driven by Lobbyists

[–] zav 2 points 2 years ago

Because they are greedy and the people making the decisions don't actively use their products

[–] silentdon 2 points 2 years ago
[–] paddirn 2 points 2 years ago

Because they’re run by people who are convinced of their own brilliance, yet have no understanding of why people actually use their sites in the first place. They have no respect for their users because they’re either too greedy and/or think they know better than anyone else.

[–] aloeha 2 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My idea is that they didn't/don't havse a choice but to try something.

They are probably running out of money and no one is giving it to them in this econimical climate.

Maybe profitability, or at least drastic measures, is the request by investors (similary how IMF is "blackmailing" countries when they give them loan).

It might also be an experiment, planned or accidental to male profit of social networks after 20 years of investing.

It is a gamble, but cut has to be made at some point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The funding runs out and they have to try and monetize their users somehow. Or the tech company goes public and now they have to try and produce increasing dividends for their investors every quarter.

If I remember right, Reddit's official reason for the api pricing change was continuous scraping of content for AI training data, putting more load on the server. There's probably some truth to that. Twitter and reddit also have very large user bases, which requires more resources.

Elon Musk being in the driver's seat of twitter probably doesn't help either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago
[–] Sir_Kevin 1 points 2 years ago

The users are not the customer. We are the product.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

The user bubble has popped now that investors started questioning why the fuck they’ve been investing huge amounts of money into companies that make no money just because they have lots of users. With that investment money drying up, these tech companies are desperate to start making a profit so they can survive and grow their value still.

TLDR: investment in unprofitable tech companies is drying up and companies that aren’t profitable are scrambling to make money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Because they realize they can get away with pretty much anything.

[–] philz 1 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Stupidity and greed, a great combination!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›