this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
16 points (83.3% liked)

Games

16944 readers
459 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

That's what they get for paying $60 for a damn skin 🤣

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Idiot gamers cry about their game made to extract money from idiots

[–] mordack550 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The article does not even show the skin...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Maybe it’s there but the camo is just that good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

There's a video on the article a little lower down the page

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

it looks really stupid, they know people would buy them just to make video content out of how stupid it is. And if you search for the camo name on youtube you can see all the victims, I hope they make back the money from youtube. lol

https://www.ign.com/articles/modern-warfare-3-camo-locked-behind-60-call-of-duty-sling-bag-is-perhaps-the-brightest-ever

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would I want to pay [$60] to get a skin that essentially flash bangs me every time I ADS?

Lol, then don't?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Seriously, why pay $60 for a skin? This is like nft's for video games

EDIT: After playing the video posted on Twitter. I can safely say that this is a "Look at me. I'm a dumbass who spent $60 for a skin! EVERYONE LOOK AT ME!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That's COD skins in a nutshell. Either that or the skin is broken and it's pay to win. If you watch any ranked play from the last game, 90% of people had the Groot skin.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

In a way it's even worse. NFT's gave people the illusion that it's an investment. This is just basically a dunce hat