this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
38 points (100.0% liked)

Science

3072 readers
1 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's not like non recycled plastic doesn't have them either.

[–] angrystego 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

From the article:

Numerous studies show that hazardous chemicals can accumulate even in relatively close-loop plastic recycling systems.

I think this is the problem. There can be toxic chemicals in new plastics too, but they accumulate in recycled plastics making them much more toxic than the original.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My bad. I lost interest and dropped the article before reaching this. It does change things. Thankfully we only recycle 1-3% of plastics {hide the pain Howard.jpg}

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think the scientists were saying we need to phase out all plastic chemicals because they are basically all non-safe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I understand that. I'm just skeptic as to this new piece of information to move the needle towards less use of plastics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That's not what I got from the article. They seemed to be talking specifically about chemicals have absorbed from what they've been in contact with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Less bad as long as its inert at room temp/normal use?