this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
94 points (98.0% liked)

SNOOcalypse - document, discuss, and promote the downfall of Reddit.

1337 readers
1 users here now

SNOOcalypse is closing down. If you wish to talk about Reddit, check out [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected].


This community welcomes anyone who wants to see Reddit gone. Nuke the Snoo!

When sharing links, please also share an archived version of the target of your link.

Rules:

  1. Follow lemmy.ml's global rules and code of conduct.
  2. Keep it on-topic.
  3. Don't promote illegal stuff here.
  4. Don't be stupid, noisy, obnoxious or obtuse (S.N.O.O.)
  5. Have fun, and enjoy the popcorn! 🍿

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: say hello to our friend u/ModCodeOfConduct, disguising threats behind feigned politeness, yet again!

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So... They're going to force reopen the subs before the API turn off and claim the protests had no effect?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think that it's their intention. Mods have a few ways to fight back, though. And I hope that they're organising a mass exodus.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would assume that means they also plan to replace the real people who left the platform with activity from bot accounts to make it seem like business as usual for the planned IPO.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Of course. Why do you think anyone attempting to delete their content is having it automatically restored? Gotta feed the bots something to repost and generate chatgpt responses with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I would assume that means they also plan to replace the real people who left the platform with activity from bot accounts to make it seem like business as usual for the planned IPO.

Possibly. But that's going to backfire badly in the light of a certain new Google feature.

[–] chellomere 1 points 1 year ago

Another example is malicious compliance, for example changing the rules of the subreddit

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

they had one job...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe some malicious compliance is needed? If the moderators keep active in their private communities, it would meet the requirements of code of conduct.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Privating subs = mods get replaced. Reddit Inc. is already doing this.

Instead I think that a better strategy is to restrict further and further the scope of the subreddit, while linking and feeding an alternative elsewhere. For example, if the subreddit is about cooking:

  • "From now on we don't allow baking posts here. Go to foobar/c/cooking to discuss those."
  • "From now on we don't allow baking posts or mentions of brands. Go to foobar/c/cooking to discuss those."
  • "From now on we don't allow baking posts, mentions of brands, or recipes without veggies. Go to foobar/c/cooking to discuss those."
  • etc.

While perhaps retro-actively removing posts breaking the new rules.

Still a form of malicious compliance, but I think that it's more effective to divert Reddit traffic to another community also controlled by the same mod team. And it should be really hard for Reddit Inc. to say "no, you need to allow baking posts here!", as it's too sub-specific and Reddit Inc. is completely out of touch with the community.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like this. It'll probably be declared "vandalism" of the community, and they'll try to ban mods, but it would affect the community's usefulness to advertisers if it becomes annoying for users, or specialized in a way that makes it unsuitable for the companies who are currently in there. Brands choose Reddit because they think they can reach exactly the people who are likely to want their products by targeting the right subreddits. Change the type of conversation in those subreddits to something that no longer attracts the audience advertisers want, and advertisers will be less interested. Forbidding brand mentions is good, too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’ll probably be declared “vandalism” of the community

Yup. But it's really hard for Reddit Inc. to track this, as long as the deletion is slow enough, and posters are "discouraged" from adding new posts; and the community still there are the ones who don't really give a damn.

Forbidding brand mentions is good, too.

Damn, that would work great on a few subs. Like r/cooking.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's true, Reddit has its hands full with red pandas and John Oliver pics. They'll probably let gradual rule changes slide for a while. Forbidding brand mentions might actually kill r/SkincareAddiction, since it's mostly product reviews and people posting blurry pictures of gnarly abscesses they believe are pimples.

load more comments
view more: next ›