this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
40 points (100.0% liked)

Physics

1332 readers
14 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well, space isn't a perfect vacuum, is it? It's pretty damn close, but you'll still encounter the occasional hydrogen molecule.
I mean, were talking about 1.7 seconds delay over a distance of 130 million lightyears! That's virtually nothing.

[–] pennomi 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In fact, this might be a good way to measure the average density of loose matter in the universe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Was thinking about that, too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And if we had enough ligos throughout the solar system, maybe we could even image dark matter distributions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It also depends on the starting point. If both the gravity wave and the light start in the middle of a star or even just inside a shell of an exploding star, or, in case of black holes, inside a cloud of matter that surrounds the hole waiting to be sucked in, there is more than enough matter to delay the light.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

They are not emitted simultaneously. The collision is messy. The GRB comes from leftover bits of neutron star.