this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
105 points (76.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43144 readers
1746 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...the next pick to the people who saw you pick the "winner". Now half of those people see one team, the other half see you pick the other team, and whoever saw you pick the winner thinks you've got a 100% accuracy rate over two games. You could do that for a while and then offer to sell your pick for the Superbowl. Starting with a big enough group in the beginning, this might be really lucrative.

But is it legal?

(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

32 teams in the NFL, 15-16 games a week.

There's approx. 240 different possible outcomes each week, chances that you land on the correct one twice in a row is near impossible.

So you wouldn't be conning anyone, unless you were picking only one game each week, in which case you have a 50% chance and therefore no one would care if you got it right twice, an octopus can do that.

Further to the above, the sports gambling industry is huge, chances that you can offer something over and above what multi-million dollar betting agencies can offer is frankly absurd unless you're an MIT Maths grad.

[โ€“] cheese_greater 1 points 10 months ago

I wonder in some sense how this isn't fundamentally (yet fucked) the same idea asthat driving arbitrage.

[โ€“] BackOnMyBS 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I've thought about this with the stock market and predicting that it would go up or down. After enough predictions, one would have an email list of people that saw one accurately predict the stock market after n times. This could then be used to request payment for future predictions.

While I can't state that this breaks any laws, it is possible it might somehow. However, even if it doesn't, it's a really fucked up thing to do because it's conning people out of money using a scam. I highly recommend against it and responding to emails of people predicting future outcomes of events that vary wildly with any certainty.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Deception is tricking people into paying or paying more for a service by lying. And Iโ€™m pretty sure a lawyer could say that that is lying UNLESS you never mentioned your last picks and how you have good choices. Just say Iโ€™m not giving my prediction for Super Bowl unless you pay $5

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

I anal, but yes this is legal. You should do it and post the results. Also this is not investment advice.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ