Ooh yeah, I know this image mostly as it being the thumbnail for Walpurgisnacht by Xomu which I know mostly for it being one of the musics used by Chess Simp.
Imaginary Witches
Imaginary Witches
A community to share images of witches and any other witch adjacent characters like dark summoners, necromancers or mages with a witchy vibe.
Rules
Posting
- Use the following format for post titles: {artwork title} by {artist}
- Add [OC] in front of the title if it's made by yourself
- If no artwork title is known use "Untitled"
- Include the source link in the post body
- Mark posts as NSFW when necessary (nudity/violence)
Content
- Shared artwork must contain a witch or witch adjacent character
- No screenshots from movies or games
- No AI art
- Depictions of artistic nudity are allowed
- Depictions of blood and violence are allowed
- Imagery of pornographic and sexual activity is not allowed
- Extreme gore is not allowed
Icon and Banner credits
- Icon: Witch by z--ed
- Banner: Witch House by VityaR83
More Communities
Cool another scantily clad child.
It's a digital drawing which is composed of pixels
Pixels don't have self awareness and a collection of pixels don't either
It's REAL LIFE CHILDREN That are harmed when involved in crimes as they cannot consent
A drawing is a drawing is an drawing and doesn't need consent and shouldn't need to consent as it's not a living being, it's just data stored on a computer
For example You wouldn't ask the characters your drawing kissing for permission to draw them kissing because that's just silly
Go after the people commiting crimes against real children as those are harming real people
Drawings cannot harm anyone because they are not real people
Weirdo sure is defensive about their pedo drawings
Yeah it's clear you're going to be a brickwall
Not my fault you think drawings who are not real people should have the same rights as people
I guess you think GTA also makes people want to shoot up people in real life or that role-playing is actually real
If you can't seperate fiction from fact then it can't really be helped
You're just making a weird irrelevant excuse for being weird. In no way did it ever matter that you're jacking off to pixels. In no way does it matter that this one time there was no victim.
You're so delusional you told me to become a detective who hunts down child pornographers in response to a simple affirmation I made: it shouldn't be normalized to look at depictions of nearly nude children.
At the time when I wrote this, a small inkling of doubt was in my mind. Maybe this was something I just don't get. Maybe the fact that this was a young child wasn't even something others noticed.
Your responses validate me entirely and now I think you should absolutely be on a watchlist of some kind.