Solution: use Firefox
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
47 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
32173 readers
463 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Easiest solution of my life xd
I guess the pdfs will be processed by google on their servers. I honestly dont want that. Is there a source?
I doubt that. There is no technical reason for that. OCR isn't that hard computationally. And from a privacy/GDPR perspective this seems like a legal mess not even google would take on.
The article states:
Chrome already had its reading mode on ChromeOS, and now Google shares that the feature is expanding to the browser on all computers
The author of the article only speculates:
Maybe we'll one day see a version of it PDFs?
Setting aside the question of privacy, this is a very nice feature. I do worry how Firefox will compete with many of these small comforts and if it may eventually fall out of favor as a viable mainstream alternative and there goes our chance at having a privacy respecting browser. I guess (hope?) there will always be a niche alternative for privacy-minded folks?
But as far as privacy I'm not sure how the scanning of PDFs will affect it. I mean everything on the internet is basically already scanned and cataloged and sharing information over public internet through PDF rather that HTML shouldn't make a difference? Unless the article means Chrome browser would be scanning private files opened through the user's computer.
The big companies at least will make using their products awful experience if you value your time, sanity, privacy or just about anything at all. Its unfortunate though how many people seem to be content in watching almost nothing but ads and maybe some other content occasionally. Those types of users will probably keep using whatever was presented to them first.
Yeah, if I run my own business and have my own email servers behind a VPN, no way in hell PDFs on that server are being indexed.
But now, if an employee opens a PDF in an email attachment and the file is sent out to Google's severs for OCR processing?? That's a huge breach of security.
We should be able to expect that what we open in our web browsers stays local.
Tesseract isn't too heavy, maybe it runs locally? 👉👈
Its likely
view more: next ›