this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
246 points (96.6% liked)

Memes

45876 readers
1209 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Fuck these no-honor cowardly weak, fake knights that hided behind common archers and waited for the French cavalry to be down to engage in the battle!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't think arrows were able to penetrate plate armor. At least from bows idk bout crossbows

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They were. Look up bodkin arrows. Also, a lot of the knights got mired, and then killed by the archers with daggers who didn't sink as much.

[–] dessimbelackis 2 points 1 year ago

Better yet look up Tods Workshop on YouTube arrows vs armour and then think of thousands upon thousands of archers piling shaft after shaft into the French knights

[–] ericbomb 10 points 1 year ago

Long bows were much more powerful than most cross bows.

Crossbows were easier to use though. First crossbows were seen in 500 bc and never really vanished.

Long bows in a trained archers hand was just better.

[–] Astroturfed 1 points 1 year ago

Plate was very vulnerable to arrows and piercing weapons. It was good against swords. Chain mail is what would stop an arrow from penetrating.

[–] gmtom 1 points 1 year ago

Common French L ✌️