Check this guy's post history, then consider his angle.
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
-17 points (36.1% liked)
sh.itjust.works Main Community
7584 readers
2 users here now
Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
he seems to have nuked his antivax posts that I saw before. Or are there 2 people named blackconservative shitposting here?
I also like how the link to 'votes mean nothing' text is just a link to his own post.
That being said, this person isn't necessarily wrong about the proposed voting method in agora being easy to manipulate. Unless we have a specific strategy to excluding bot votes, there will be bots.
lmao true, i guess "black conservative" was already a clue
It does kind of make you think they're not good at looking out for their own interests, eh?
I think we should be able to have a adult conversation without attacking my ethnicity or political leanings.
I'm not attacking anyone. You chose your username.
Dude. Really?
Yes my post are controversial. I don't expect to be in the trusted counsel. I don't expect to even not be banned in the coming weeks. I'm just a user here enjoying his time and don't want to see other's manipulated by what is an OBVIOUS logical flaw.
I mean, the real problem is twofold. First, that there's no reliable notifications at all. Lemmy via web, or in the apps, you don't get notifications. I've yet to get a single one about anything. This means that voting is rng.
That's amplified by the fact that the instance is open. While bots aren't going to get in, it simply doesn't matter if they're was a an attempt to limit voting to accounts on the instance because it's trivial to make one.
Now, I'm not complaining about open signup! I prefer that. But it makes it very easy to stack accounts. Not that closed signups prevent it, that just slows it.
But it makes the semblance of democracy paper thin. So, you get a handful of people able to sway decisions with little or no way to prevent it. Since anyone with sense is using VPNs to begin with, you can't even rely on ip addresses to counter the issue.
That being said, I'm still behind the experiment. It's worth trying. That's because we already have the backstop that any forum has: there's someone with veto power, should they choose to use it. The dude abides. We all have to trust the host to even be here. We therefore have to trust that he will both honor the voting, but step in when there's a problem and veto things. I do trust him for that.
What's funny is that there's zero chance I would do what he's doing. No way in hell I'm going to pay for the upkeep of an instance, put in the work for it, and not make it very clear that there's limits and that I would stomp all over dumb shit. But it is still worth trying.
Atleast you can see the problem. Most these commenters just can't seem to understand how it can easily be rigged . I don't care I can go to another instance
I think everyone should trust me to control what they see.
Joking aside, voting is the least worst form of content management. It’s gamed for sure, but so is everything else.
My grampa fished almost exclusively with plugs. Anyone remember how slashdot use todo mod points? You had to earn them by getting point from other users. It suck everyone left as soon as there was an other option.
A council of trusted people. I've seen that somewhere else before. How were these people called..... Ah yes: Sowiet.
I don't think we should get to hung up my my proposed solution. If you don't like it it's fine to address my concerns with a better solution.
You see a problem where there is none: Don't like voting, find an anarchist lemmy instance. Don't like this either? Open your own. That's the beauty of the Fediverse, you're not prisoner of a centralised platform, the same service, the same information can get to you via any other instance.
So one user having 50 votes and one user having 1 vote is voting?
Voting is voting. Nobody was talking about fair, equal etc votes.
Right now the way votes are cast it imperfect and can be exploited by using sockpuppet accounts, but this can change at any time and switch to a polling service. Is that better? Well maybe, electronic voting is hard.
But as I said: Your issue is a non-issue, the inherent nature of the Fediverse makes it irrelevant, just switch instance, self-host... There's no exclusivity here. You're not the customer or the product here, you're a contributor and you can contribute from anywhere.
Voting is voting. Nobody was talking about fair, equal etc votes.
Feels kinda pointless if votes are not fair or equal. Then it just becomes a battle of who has the most free time.
You might not want to look into most voting mechanisms used in representative democracies...
like apartheid? This is apartheid
Quite hyperbolic. Sorry but I don't see a point for further engagement, I don't see me your you benefitting from continuing this exchange. You don't want to engage nor reason, you like to deflect. Which is a fine strategy to look smart, but it doesn't further the discussion.
On a personal note; Find an instance that doesn't give you grievances.
You don’t want to engage nor reason, you like to deflect.
1 person can have 100 alts making voting un fair. You have not provided a solution to the problem. You have not engaged at all.
view more: next ›