this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
158 points (93.4% liked)

Privacy

29854 readers
1563 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
158
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Warning to all Brave Browser Users

Blocking variations.brave.com which is used for A/B testing could potentially break Brave's functionalities. For me did Brave's "forgetful browsing" feature broke which seems to be disabled by default if you block this domain.

#brave #bravebrowser #privacy @privacy @privacyguides

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 187 points 9 months ago (50 children)

You really just shouldn't use brave..

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Do you think we are not Brave enough.

Sorry... I will see myself out.

load more comments (49 replies)
[–] [email protected] 109 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Anyoneserioius about privacy should not be using a chromium browser, and should definitely not be using brave.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Firefox is safer and tbh, has probably the best UX and aesthetics out of anyone. Brave is garbage.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

For incognito browsing I recommend Librewolf, a firefox fork. If you want anything more secure, you should start looking into tor

[–] MrPoopbutt 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why is librewolf superior to our of the box Firefox? Or mullvad browser for that matter?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

It has included some privacy measures to resist fingerprinting like letterboxing and has more privacy focused search engines as default like searx. Also it takes out some firefox utilities like pocket which I don't really use

As for Mullwav browser I'm not really sure, it seems to be another reinforced firefox like librewolf

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)
[–] Linus_Torvalds 2 points 9 months ago

Btw, here is a detailed, technical review. It is in German, but with transtae and all the code, it should be understandable.

TLDR: It's good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (9 children)

As a Firefox user, the only thing Brave does that I wish Firefox would copy is their fingerprinting resistance. I know Firefox does have fingerprinting resistance but it's nowhere near the same level as Brave.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Use privacy badger extension

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Brave is just a shill for Google mothership. Firefox is leading privacy and security through browsers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Firefox has a weaker sandbox than chromium and less mature site isolation and therefore has lower security. privacy is a different story, but remember you're only as private as you are secure so Firefox is inherently not that private assuming a malicious site escapes the sandbox.

I'm fully against chrome's growing monopoly as well as Google surveillance capitalism but let's not be so dramatic with the "google mother ship" nonsense.

using chromium as a base does not equal data being sent back to Google, just like using Android as a base doesn't inherently send data back to Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I disagree. Firefox is fine, but saying chromium is spyware because its primarily maintained by google is like saying android is spyware.

Additionally chromium browsers are arguably more secure than Firefox, and has more advanced sand boxing. So much so that graphine OS used chromium instead of Firefox for their vanadium browser.

Only thing I agree with is not using brave.. Cause well.. They fishy.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Those who don't know about it go and read GNU replicantOS blog and wikipedia page

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Android is not a single OS (?)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is. Custom roms modify very little of the code and they are all based on aosp(it is open source but google controlls the changes). The whole point of aosp is to create the illusion of choice but if you really want to avoid using google spyware you have to give up on most apps or go to extreme lenghts to use an alternative. The grapheneos project is really cool and usefull but it only patches the inherent (intended)problems of android and doesnt provide a real solution.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] darklordcrouton 2 points 9 months ago

I truly appreciate the perspective of this post. I would like to switch fully to Firefox and support the cause. Unfortunately I have a PWA addiction and that is the only thing keeping me living my shameful hybrid browser life.

Is it a weak reason? Probably. But it's an honest one. If Mozilla hopped on PWAs, I'd be totally fine bouncing from Brave and joining the Chromium rebellion.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dukethorion 89 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'll be the one to stay on topic instead of joining the omgchromebad crowd.

My question/concern would be, why would a browser need to connect to an outside source in order to Forget your browsing? What would it need to reference?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›