this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
152 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

6938 readers
460 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


👒 Lifestylecoming soon


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Other


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here:

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No porn.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

IMO, commercial water extraction permits should be linked to aquifer recovery; if the aquifer levels are dropping, the commercial companies should be required to stop until the aquifer is stable again. If it never becomes stable again due to other pressures, commercial extraction never starts again.

That’s the way the permits SHOULD be granted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I like your approach, and for what it’s worth, I live in about a half km from the aberfoyle bottling plant, and am on well water from the same aquifer as the plant. I’ve never once had well issues, or low water.

I’m in no way trying to “carry water” for a terrible company like Nestle, however the impact on the local populations water supply is minimal, and the community benefits from tax dollars that keep our property costs relatively low and our community centres and parks well maintained.

Again, fuck nestle and their more nefarious business practices, but there is some nuance to the discussion.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

Letting corporations drain our water reserves for the most meager of profits feels incredibly shortsighted, but especially so when you consider literally every long-term climate model. That water is going to be incredibly valuable in the not-too-distant future

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The other important half of this is limiting bottled water. They are only extracting because someone is buying it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@MacroCyclo @grte

People trust bottled water that is NOT tested more than they trust municipal water that is tested multiple times per day.

I don't understand that at all.

[–] sulgoth 5 points 9 months ago

Municipal water has to publicly report problems, private bottled water doesn't. It looks like they're safer only because they're quieter about it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Nestle actually sold off their water bottling operation in 2021 due to all the bad press. Blue Triton is the result of that sale.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just ban water taking unless it is from waste water or rain water. There is no reason you need to take water from untapped sources for commercial use.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick 5 points 9 months ago

I'm iffy on rain water. On the small scale it's fine, but it might have be impacts for something large scale.

Go ham on seawater and desalination though.