this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
159 points (98.2% liked)

Biodiversity

1427 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/Biodiversity @ Mander.xyz!

A community about the variety of life on Earth at all levels; including plants, animals, bacteria, and fungi.



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.

2023-06-16: We invite our users to contribute resources for the sidebar.

2023-06-15: Looking for mods!



About

Biodiversity is a term used to describe the enormous variety of life on Earth. It can be used more specifically to refer to all of the species in one region or ecosystem. Biodiversity refers to every living thing, including plants, bacteria, animals, and humans. Scientists have estimated that there are around 8.7 million species of plants and animals in existence. However, only around 1.2 million species have been identified and described so far, most of which are insects. This means that millions of other organisms remain a complete mystery.

Over generations, all of the species that are currently alive today have evolved unique traits that make them distinct from other species. These differences are what scientists use to tell one species from another. Organisms that have evolved to be so different from one another that they can no longer reproduce with each other are considered different species. All organisms that can reproduce with each other fall into one species. Read more...

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Quick Links

Resources



Bypass Paywalls



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes



Find us on Reddit!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I ~~hate~~ strongly dislike that they are using the word 'extinct' for an animal that is not.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Local extinction (extirpation) is a legitimate concept that is heavily studied in ecology. Just because an animal is still alive somewhere it doesn't mean that its absence from a region it has historically lived is irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The audience for Newsweek is lay people not ecologists. It's completely predictable that this usage of the word would create misunderstanding. Seems like misleading clickbait to me with a cover of plausible deniability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obviously, but that doesn't mean they don't interview ecologists or biologists. “Extirpation” is way less layman friendly than "locally extinct," and the article makes it extremely clear that this is an animal that hadn't been seen in a specific region for years. Skimming the headline and deciding it means "they thought it was completely extinct" is a problem with the reader, not the headline or the term "locally extinct."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The title doesn't say "locally extinct". Do you really not understand how click bait titles work and why they are shitty?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You know I guess you have a point, if they're writing for people who are too dim to realize "locally extinct" and "extinct in region" are the same concept.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I thought the same. How hard would it have been to add "thought to be" behind that.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 2 points 1 year ago

And even then, it's apparently still going in other areas, just "extinct" in that area.

[–] reallynotnick 1 points 1 year ago

It's a bit weird because it's "in a region", which begs the question if I capture a creature from a different region and move it to a region where it was extinct, is it extinct anymore? (There being only one also means it will quickly become 0 again.)

Idk, just a weird thought.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well when you think the animal is extinct for over 100 years it’s generally the word you use.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So now it's a tinct animal?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


"The species was considered extinct in South Australia, with no official records for some 100 years or more," National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) Limestone Coast district ranger Ross Anderson told Newsweek.

"I expected to find a cat, but I found this little animal instead," Pao told local news ABC South East SA.

The quolls usually eat a wide range of prey, including lizards, snakes, poultry, small rodents, and other marsupials such as wombats and wallabies.

"Part of the reason they're thought to have become extinct here in the South East is due to a loss of habitat, but they can survive anywhere from forests to more open country," Anderson told ABC.

The quoll was caught in another trap by the NPWS on Wednesday, and the experts hope to genetically test the animal to join the dots of its origins.

We wouldn't recommend people try to trap them or interact with them themselves, however, but trail cameras are a really good way of recording and monitoring any suspected quoll populations or activity in the local area," Anderson said.


The original article contains 692 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Cute little critter.