this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

Futurology

1378 readers
1 users here now

Futurology: A space for the discussion of the future of us - the human organism, and the relationship we have with the spaces we may inhabit.

I have only two rules for this community:

** Respect the Community.**

** Respect one another.**

Freedom of speech comes with freedom to experience consequence.

Enjoy this community, enrich yourself as you enrich others. If you have any questions about this community or how it is run, you are welcome to contact the moderator.

Asstronaut

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As the field of implantable brain devices moves in leaps and bounds, there will come a time in the future when we will need to consider obsolescence of these devices, and as the implants grow in complexity and scope, will we eventually have to redefine our idea of what it is to be human?

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you let anyone put an implant in your brain you’re dumber than a roomba.

[–] Asstronaut 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What if that implant was capable of curing you of a disease, like blindness or paralysis?

[–] Noodle07 3 points 1 year ago

Or executive dysfunction

[–] MyFairJulia 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then we need to reconsider capitalism, because that system is dependent on you buying stuff repeatedly. I really don't like the idea of a blind person getting their vision back only for that implant to fail.

[–] Asstronaut 1 points 1 year ago

Or being forced to watch ads every hour unless they upgrade to vision+ monthly subscription

[–] Korkki 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There are really good points in the article about obsolescence. Like if some poor shmuck actually goes and takes the neuralink surgery, even if it's for a valid medical or QoL reason and not just because cool early adopter factor and then the firm goes bust and customers have useless electrodes in their brains that is no longer supported by any company and made near impossible to hack because of close source software. Even if a company stays in business, but the tech itself might get old and then it's a whole new thing to getting it removed and upgraded. There are other reasons why these things can't really require cracking open a persons skull when installing or doing maintenance.

For wider adoption a BCI can't be no more invasive than a injection and preferably being non permanent. Like Darpa N3 programs has studied these kinds of things with totally non invasive methods and injectable nanotransducers...

[–] Asstronaut 1 points 1 year ago

Excellent summary! Yes the obsolescence will be a massive problem given the high-risk nature of any procedure to access the cranial vault. I can’t see this technology moving out of the therapeutic realm until viable non-invasive alternatives exist, I feel people will be much more comfortable to experiment with this tech once they know they can simply switch it off or detach it without risking their biology. I can see a cultural shift occurring with the advent of this type of technology, from short sighted consumerism to something a bit more holistic and long-term