this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
109 points (95.8% liked)

Games

32724 readers
2515 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No fees for Personal tier or old/current projects, new 2.5% revenue cap, and more.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Spudwart 83 points 1 year ago

This is standard business tactics.

Do not fall for it.

An absurd change followed by rolling it back to an “acceptable” version that is still worse than their original position prior to the initial announcement.

This is a psychological manipulation.

And more to the point it ignores the issue of their violation of trust and consistency.

This is still precedent, they still showed their hand.

They want to have “passive income” at your expense.

Learn Godot.

[–] ekZepp 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Okay, okay... Let's admit that our old idea of pi**ing all over your heads may have gone a little too far....

So, here's the deal. We will pi** a bit on your left shoulder ...BUT! But, but, but.... It will be UPWIND!! SEE!? Upwind!!

So basically, you'll be missed most of the times! Basically like never get hit at all!" 👍

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't worry, 90% of our users won't have to pay anything at all! Just ignore that like 50% are people who downloaded Unity to mess around for a bit and never made anything other than a "hello world" or similar.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was going to say 89% but there's a lot of asset flips on Steam.

[–] thrakkerzog 11 points 1 year ago

I've pooped in your soup and removed the poop when you got angry. You're still gonna eat the soup, right?

[–] morgan_423 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Far too little, far too late. Even if this was the most glowing revision ever (it isn't, but even if it was), the trust is gone.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I know I won't be using it. There is no guarantee that they won't do something similar in the future.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

And therein lies the rub.

They’ve proven they can’t be trusted. The people who devised and attempted to enact this plan - the exec team - have not gone anywhere, and they aren’t going to. They have shown the industry who they are, and they clearly don’t give a shit about business ethics or even legality (the AppLovin shit smells an awful fucking lot like anticompetitive market interference). They will definitely try something similar in the future.

[–] PlushySD 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can just creep up the fee bit by bit and they can say, hey it's not as bad as that runtime fee we announced in 2023

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not just that but what other new fee will they create and force on developers out of nowhere?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just the fact that they'll spy on me when I install a game, makes me want to avoid buying unity games forward.

In fact, they certainly already have some analytics, so yeah, I'll avoid unity for my games from now on...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So this was the actual deal they were going for. We'll see if the big players will stick with unity.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Considering the trust they've lost I don't think they've planned to do it this way. And if they didn't plan it, they assumed that their original plan wasn't going to result in much opposition, so that was the plan they wanted to go with.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

It doesn't matter.

They showed their hand. They can and will change pricing after the fact. Who would want that kind of liability on their product?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

fair changes, but the ONLY way forward is to fire riccitello. i don’t see how anyone can trust them again until that happens.

removal of the retroactivity piece will likely appease a large number of devs tho (dunno if it’ll be the majority but that was the biggest wtf for me)

[–] PlushySD 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As that's what I want to see also. But Spez is still Reddit CEO, Bobby Kotik is still Blizzard's CEO... I guess Riccitello will stay there for a while

[–] MrPoopyButthole 1 points 1 year ago

The unfortunate cushion of being a rich powerful asshole

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I still think its a terrible idea to start a new project in unity, but for developers who are too far into a project to reasonably switch without spending a lot of time or money (like Ultrakill or Silksong), this is good as it means they can finish their games without having to worry about a passive income loss which could put them out of business.

[–] MrPoopyButthole 4 points 1 year ago

"I am sorry," Unity executive and industry veteran Marc Whitten said in the blog post.

[–] PlushySD 3 points 1 year ago

sound of me spitting I'll wait until next year to see what's really gonna happen.