I agree, smoothskin. This makes me want to play fallout 2 again :)
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
51 points (90.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43329 readers
814 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The most creepy thing is if porn is already fake AF why would someone wank to even more fake porn? 🤣🤣
There's not enough variety in body type either... It's just boring! And why is it only women, where are the men??
Training the algorithm?
Lol you got me there, that's definitely the issue!
It’s weird for sure. Like an uncanny valley cartoon.
TIL AI por exists
Faces all looking the same is possibly because people are hesitant to post their AI images of IRL celebs etc. Stable diffusion is really good at creating that sort of thing
One of the most popular AI porn communities has IRL people banned as a rule. Can't say I blame them given all the ethical concerns.
Honestly I've been wondering why AI porn is so... predictably unusual? Like I would have imagined having AI means we'll have absurd pterodactyl porn, but instead it's just nude photography but AI
Back in secondary school, before AI art was even a thing, there was a guy who sent me a pic of a girl in her underwear. The head was out of frame, but he claimed he had been sent it by another girl in the school.
Of course, it wasn't her. Pay even a little attention to the picture beyond the boobs, and it's obvious it's someone else. It was a shitty thing to do, especially for the girl he claimed it to be. I think he just wanted the credit for something he found with very little effort.
We don't talk anymore, but I feel like he's the kind of person who really enjoys AI porn. He gets to put in very little effort, then claim credit for something that falls apart if you pay attention to it. And he doesn't like people, so he's fine with them being completely removed from the action.
Yes you are the only person in the entire world who finds it creepy
Between the removal of nsfw from r/all and my browsing Lemmy there seems to have been quite the explosion in AI generated nudity. One of the things I liked about the r/all nsfw was the “discovery” as I might flip through the days latest news. I say that because the images I’ve seen are whatever you horny bastards upvote enough to make a Top list. The AI images look like bad Instagram filters - or maybe filters that are just too good. It’s almost past the uncanny valley, but not quite. As for the skin tone and ethnicity I just assume that’s the bulk of the user base self-selecting.
I will say that my teenage self would have been salivating at these. The older me finds most of them, if not disturbing/offputting for appearing so young, a bit too perfect for my taste. To drop a quote: “the sadder but wiser girl’s the girl for me” these days.
i haven't currently seen any outside of 2d art and honestly i'd prefer to keep it that way. it's a big grey area consent wise and the whole thing just kind of freaks me out.
lighting. the odd lighting aspect I find the weirdest. other than that, it's just slightly different porn.
view more: next ›