this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
27 points (88.6% liked)

Ontario

2062 readers
15 users here now

A place to discuss all the news and events taking place in the province of Ontario, Canada.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cursive is making a comeback. Relegated in 2006 to an optional piece of learning in Ontario elementary schools, cursive writing is set to return as a mandatory part of the curriculum starting in September.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Anyone know what research the minister is referencing? The academic later quoted said there wasn't much research. I also wonder what was the basis for dropping cursive... The article appears to be just a bunch of cheering with little substance or context.

Personally I just dislike cursive and always have. Other people's cursive writing is a pain in the he ass to read much of the time. The speed benefit is crushed by legibility issues. Doing a lot of genealogy research for example really underscores this, when most documents were hand written in cursive. .Yeah, great I can read cursive, but it is so often tedious and painful to decipher. There is a reason many forms came to say "print clearly". Just my opinion and experience.

Not a super big deal either way, but so far I'm glad my kids didn't have to bother with cursive. Artist, musician and computer programmer. Bilingual. Cursive-free!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Also, in this day and age where we write 95%+ using a keyboard, I find that advocating a speed benefit when writing by hand is pretty pointless.

My daughter had learning disability, and having to learn to write 2 different alphabet (cursive and not) would have been. A pain... One was enough

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's Lecce. Don't expect anything resembling reality outta that guy.

As for cursive itself the only positives I've seen mentioned in research and in anecdotal conversations is that physically writing information down helps with memory retention as opposed to typing it out on a keyboard. Although I'd imagine the same could be said about simply printing it out by hand.

It'll be interesting to see what style they introduce in this new curriculum. Looking at examples online my style fits mostly with the Zaner-Bloser method.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There have been a number of studies (one, two, three) that show that writing notes by hand is better for memory retention than typing. Some of the studies have used only handwriting vs typing, some are writing on paper vs typing, and some try to use a tablet or smartphone as the digital alternative (sometimes with a stylus).

When I'm hand printing, it's much slower than hand writing. My normal scrawl is an awful hybrid of the two that only I can read, but it's what I used through university. I don't think I could have kept up with lectures if I was printing, and the research is seemingly in favour of paper instead of digital. Handwriting helped me if only because it gave me a method of writing quickly.

That said, if Leece was actually referring to this research, he'd be able to defend his position pretty easily. Given all the handwaviness, it's probably just another way to cut funding from schools and he just make up a reason that happened to match some studies.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s funny. I’ve had discussions with a lot of bitter people who complain about having been forced to learn cursive. I luckily really enjoyed calligraphy and cursive. It remains important in my field of work (STEM) to a certain extent.

At the end of the day, I view cursive as a positive for many reasons: it is artistic, it teaches fine motor control, and despite changes in the way we work, handwriting remains important and useful in many areas of work.

I see it the same way I see the importance of sketching and visualising. I expect most learned people to be able to take a pen and sketch or illustrate when needed. Cursive is just a vehicle for similar skills.

Of course it needs to be balanced with the teaching of other subjects, but I do not think that school is lacking of time to teach subjects. There is plenty of time during childhood to learn skills. This is one such skill.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I tend to agree. And honestly I don't remember it taking much time to learn either.

[–] humutoor 1 points 1 year ago

I think the bigger issue is having teachers who don’t want to teach cursive teach it. Growing up when I learned it, you could tell the teacher didn’t care for it and spent minimal time assisting with not just learning but learning correctly. If the teacher doesn’t care, why would the students?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

we learned when i was a kid and NEVER used it at all. I was so stressed out trying to learn it. I already had difficulty printing then they wanted me to learn cursive so i did and then never used it even once.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Teach keyboarding instead, will be a lot more useful.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In most professions; typing is a needed skill, while cursive isn't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Have to agree here.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

When I went to school we started the year already behind schedule in math, and science. Maybe we could be spending our childrens time a little more wisely.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'm sort of confused by this: the point of cursive was to make it more efficient to write quickly, without lifting pen from paper and causing blotting.

In a very "medium is the message" way, it's tied to the pen. In an era of pencils and pens that don't blot (and this little thing called a "keyboard") it really is kind of an anachronism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Oh, great. This will come in clutch when you get sent back in time and have to write Aunt Tilly from the front line of the Boer War.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The shocking piece of this news story for me was that it was ever made optional in the first place! Crazy to think a large portion of some ~17 years of students don't know how to read or write it!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I mean the argument of practicality can still be made though, When was the last time you had to read or write cursive? Really just for your signature at this point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

What advantages does cursive grant in this age?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

because it pointless today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've noticed that cursive writing is more common amongst French-Canadians. I think it's because their education system is more European compared to the Anglo-Canadian one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems like a fair thing to teach considering students will be writing exams by hand most of their lives. Sucks that they just threw curriculum changes so last minute at the teachers without much support.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

That seems very silly..

load more comments
view more: next ›