I tend to be pretty pessimistic about these cases. Even if the UK Govt win, Google won't change anything, or if they do the change will be subtle enough to not have any impact
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
433 points (99.1% liked)
Privacy
32173 readers
486 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm not so sure, if it is quite expensive and carries on being quite expensive, they may need to make changes to default search or default browsers. If this can help people get Firefox easier, this could start to chip away at the viability of WEI (web DRM).
quite expensive
this is a £7 billion fine against a company that can afford to pay apple £1.2 billion for a system default...
Because they gain more from it. They pay Firefox for default search. There is a return on investment. $7bn is a larger cost and would need greater revenue from those activities to justify it. Whether they do or not, from the UK market, we'll have to wait and see, but it is a reasonable dint.
Just cost of doing business for Google
7 billion is not just "cost of business" for Google lmao
Some of you are so out if touch from this world if you think Google isn't really concerned about such an amount
Who is eligible for compensation?
... all UK consumers who bought goods or services from a business who advertised using search advertising services provided by Google. This is effectively everyone in the UK.
Consumers do not have to have seen these goods and services advertised on Google, or used Google to have purchased the goods or services. This is because the claim says that these inflated prices were paid by everyone if the business advertised on Google.
Consumers affected by the Google claim could be owed around £100 if the claim is won. They will not pay costs or fees to participate. The claim is being funded by global litigation funder Hereford Litigation.
An interesting case and claim. Indirect correlation.
Make them cry.
Let's say google is fined 7B. Is there any real competition for the search engine space. Maybe Bing the next big mainstream service. Brave? DDG? They all have some flaw though and isn't as seamless as Google.
True, but imo ddg has gotten pretty close in terms of capability.
But Google has become the Walmart of the internet. The only thing their missing is a literal storefront.
Need email? Gmail. Need a browser? Google Chrome Want entertainment? YouTube Search engine? Google Phone OS? Android (most) Chromebooks, Google Office Suite, AdSense.
Google has way too much power over the internet.
I haven't tried DDG ever since the whole Microsoft fiasco but I'll give it another try. I do agree with everything else you said though. Thank goodness I have degoogled my devices.
I think Google Shopping counts as a storefront
Ahhh, feels good, my faith in humanity is (briefly) restored, waiting to see them actually pay it
I wouldn't get excited until it's successful. They got expensive lawyers.
Meh Cost of doing business which is already accounted.
Maybe so but it's still a step in the right direction. Legal precedent is important to pave the way for larger changes.
I wish we had some leadership with the balls to do some post industrial revolution style trust busting