There should be no technical reason why not, with an Nginx reverse proxy in front to handle connecting to the docker containers.
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)
Selfhosted
39948 readers
513 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Pardon my ignorance here: that's essentially what maps the container's port# to the server's port#, right? Networking is not my strong suit. :D
Yes, that's how you'd route the hosts incoming traffic (normally to port 443 and redirect 80 to SSL 443) to the ports set for the containers
Docker has built-in port mapping for that (-p in docker run). Nginx does effectively let you do additional port mapping but it's most commonly used to let you map a subdomain to a port (virtual host) and/or perform SSL termination.
That way you can hit https://service.host.com instead of http://host.com:4829
you could use yunohost to host all of those too