this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
472 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

48655 readers
377 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I’m honestly surprised it took Red Hat this long to do something like this. It really is a dreadful move even if they can do it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Fuck, I really hope this doesn't turn the tides for other Red Hat projects.

Not even my Linux distros can escape the enshittiness. WTF man.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I use Fedora, but I'm very uneasy with the fact that they are married to Red Hat. If things go south for Fedora, I hope a community driven fork can survive if not Fedora itself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not to mention CentOS stream is now essentially a fork of current code... total bummer. WTF.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

It's ultimately because of capital. Capital controls resource allocation, so any project that requires resources will have to align with capital interests

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What's to stop the CentOS-like distributions from each purchasing 1 copy of RHEL? Wouldn't that copy still be under GPL, with the software freedoms intact -They can then change and give away anything based on RHEL - they might have to strip out any artwork that is RHEL-specific but they have to do that anyway. Would Red Hat be able to stop them under GPL? Could Red Hat just refuse the sale?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Fuckkkk

Huge L for the community and for my cheap ass company that will likely be migrating away soon 😭

[–] lhx 3 points 2 years ago

Well, I was already considering getting rid of my Fedora installs; this just cements that. I'm thinking Debian 12 for base, and then do nix for userland, like how FreeBSd does it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Users looking to run an EL-like linux that pre-dates RedHat's derivation and meddling will want to look at PCLinuxOS .

Its pedigree is mageia, so Mandrake and Conectiva.

While it's got a horrifically bad PXE install, and while that means Vagrants and templates are ghetto and thin on the ground, it's otherwise a very fine OS with a wide compatibility range that RH couldn't even match with this AppStream bullshit (ohai, /etc/alternatives).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LucidDaemon 3 points 2 years ago

Well that's annoying. I use Fedora for my desktop and rocky for homelab. This would essentially kill 2/3rds of my servers and remove a lot of application support for Fedora.

[–] tubbadu 2 points 2 years ago

What may this cause to a casual fedora user?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Yes dumb. Also buffoons.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›