hot take - it’s a good thing discord can monetise without turning to adverts or “curated” feeds.
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
68 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
60073 readers
3459 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
How will this be any different from how current servers are run? Rather than getting a special role after donating that unlocks hidden channels, they're making it more obvious by saying which channels are subscriber-only.
It seems more of a competition against Patreon than anything else. Nobody is going to use this to hide discussion and share subscriber-only secrets, it's definitely for content creators that want to sell early access and such.
Good for them, make some money without shoving ads up our asses and still delivering a useful product. This sounds like good news to me if you like discord free without ads
I'm inclined to agree. They have to make money somehow. Selling entirely optional stuff is about as unobtrusive as it gets.
Admittedly, I'm not sure how successful that's gonna be. I don't really get the appeal of buying some of those things. But it doesn't hurt me.
I can at least see it working as a Patreon replacement. Lots of people using Patreon already use discord, so why not do it all in one place? Doesn't change things for consumers one bit.
So this is adding subscriptions to servers, and allowing server owners to sell exclusive content. I don't see this as a negative if the server owners get some of the profits. To me, it seems they are trying to take market shares from services such as Patreon with the move. It might indicate the beginning of trying to close their ecosystem and forcing users to go through their channels for anything related to subscriptions/income. This would be a negative in my opinion, further closing off and fragmenting social communities on the internet. Let's hope this doesn't happen, but at least there are alternatives available if things get out of hand.
number go uppy
Good, we could use a reason to switch to Fediverse alternatives.
They're already kind of doing both of these things