Ah yes, let's believe the very reliable CIA and their informants about threats against the CIA. They've proven themselves so trustworthy in the past.
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
37 points (97.4% liked)
World News
31540 readers
325 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
While the ultimate source is probably the CIA, this is the Jerusalem Post reporting about an upcoming book by an academic historian—so it’s presumably been vetted by a few other parties.
The term "vetted" is doing a lot of heavy work there. "Laundered" would be far more accurate in this context of imperialist invention of reality or consent manufacturing.
this is the Jerusalem Post reporting
it’s presumably been vetted
Vetted it probably has been, as for it being vetted for truthfulness...
All we can say for certain is that a Jerusalem Post reporter and a Harvard historian want us to believe the article’s content. We may believe, independently, that the CIA also want us to believe it—but if the CIA wanted the opposite, we’d still be reading the same article. So the trustworthiness of the article’s content depends on the trustworthiness of the reporter and the historian, not the CIA.
Russia literally attempted to assassinate a man and his daughter in Salisbury, UK.
This is their MO, just like the song "It's raining men!" Isn't a celebration in Moscow, it's a warning to take cover.
You believe that story too?
Yeah actually, I do.
I also work with Russians, they know the score.
You believe the bs they pump out on state media?
You believe the bs they pump out on state media?
After restating that they believe the bs pumped out on their state media.
Based. I hope the FSB and CIA kill eachother until there are no more glowies.
Yeah OK. So they've known about this for 3 years now, and decided to release the information now? Smells like another Havana Syndrome case.
It is actually because he was under a version of witness protection but then used his real name for a fishing license iirc
If proven wouldn't this be an act of war?
view more: next ›