No, but you better ditch brave and set up Firefox. They did some shady shit in the past and tried to deny or cover it up.
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
29 points (87.2% liked)
Privacy
32167 readers
295 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
And it’s based on Chromium which does the open web no favors.
Librewolf is probably a safer choice.
On mobile?
Mull and Tor browser for android, Librewolf and Tor browser for PC
Fennec (Firefox for Android) with uBlock and NoScript
Mulch, focus on security (same as Bromite), OE Mull, focus on privacy, both can be installed from F-Droid
This is the right answer.
Lots of Firefox fanboys on here I see....
The Brave ad blocker is based on uBlock Origin, AFAIK, so no, you don’t need it.
Not sure why you're getting downvotes because you're essentially correct. Their adblocker is written in rust and they say it's based off uBO.
Depends on what block lists you use and how aggressive you want the filtering to be. I've been using Brave for a while and tested it with and without uBO. With Brave Shield set to aggressive blocking (what I higly recommend) it blocked about 99,5 of all the stuff uBO would block.