this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Almost anything regarding Singapore

469 readers
1 users here now

Singapore related posts (any deletion by moderators WILL come with explanation) Moderation will be stepped up as the community grows. Ask Singapore related questions at !asksingapore

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Dgaf? What's the point? Bunch of jokers? Tharman sure win? Down with the establishment?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyd 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The biggest problem with Tharman is that he's wasted in the role. But hey, it's his decision to run...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yea, I feel like he's really wasted. It's quite the paradox now, I feel like not voting for him would be better for him.

[–] Wabbitsmiles 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed. Would've liked him as PM

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Wabbitsmiles @singapore it’s because many would’ve wanted him to be a PM, that they pushed him for presidency so that you can vote.
PM doesn’t need to be voted in by the people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yay. Holiday.

Also, whatever your leaning is, VOTE!

[–] Anduin1357 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not Tan Kin Lian? Presidents became figureheads, might as well go for the funni and who knows if he's actually good in the same vein as Ukraine's Zelensky? At the very least it would make Singapore politics spicy.

[–] Wabbitsmiles 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It'll further enforce the mockery about SG presidency

  1. sitting government change the constitution
  2. Jokers get nominated
  3. Singaporeans vote in jokers for shits and giggles
  4. .....
  5. Profit!
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Wabbitsmiles @singapore I thought they were unhappy when the govt change the rules and a “joker” sits.

Now they’ll vote in a “joker” just for laughs.