this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3091 readers
102 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The European Court of Human Rights is hugely important. From the right to an education to the right to vote, it covers and protects all aspects of our lives. The idea of losing it cause of some lies about “boat people” is terrifying and the effect on our lives untold.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Can someone explain how exactly the ECHR protects us? Or anyone for that matter? The ECHR doesn't make laws in our country, that's just not how government works here. And I don't think it makes laws anywhere else either. So what exactly does it do and how does it do it?

Genuinely interested if anyone can explain.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/questions_answers_eng#:~:text=The%20Court%20applies%20the%20European,or%2C%20sometimes%2C%20by%20States.

https://research.senedd.wales/research-articles/a-quick-guide-to-human-rights-in-wales/

As I see it, it’s like workers rights…a lot of people are like “I don’t need rights cause I don’t know anyone that’s died at work”. People haven’t died at work because we have those rights.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks 🙏.

So basically complaints are make to the ECHR by individuals from states that have signed up to it. They hear the case and issue a judgement on whether they think a violation has occured. But they don't stop bad laws behind passed. They will only hear a case after the fact. Cheers.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a very broad area of what after the fact means.

Unjustly locked up? The echr can set you free.

About to be deported, to a country where you will be executed? You can appeal all the way up to the echr and they can block you from being deported until it's sorted.

Property about to be unjustly seized without compensation? You can often stonewall and resist seizure while appealing all the way up to the echr.

So they can and do act as an immediate remedy for harms. But they don't deal in hypotheticals, and it's fine to have all of these dumb things passed into law providing you don't try and act on them.

Also many human rights violations don't make it all the way to the echr. Knowing the way the echr will rule makes other judges reinterpret the law so it's consistent with our human rights. In the UK, they're obliged to do this.

Edit: you can tell it's useful because of all the politicians complaining about our rights.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

As has been said elsewhere on this post, if you sign up to the ECHR you’re agreeing to apply these laws in your country.

[–] C4d 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you sign up to the ECHR you are saying that you will secure the rights defined under it within your jurisdiction; that's Article 1. So it doesn't make the laws, but it requires that they be made.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The European Court of Human Rights enforces the European Convention on Human Rights, which is an internationally treaty that was ratified in the UK in 1951 (with enthusiastic support from Churchill). It lists a bunch of fundamental rights.

In 1998, the UK passed the Human Rights Act, which provides these protections under domestic law, with the European court acting as a backstop.

So, yes, this is domestic law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Max Robbespear did a video of someone giving one good example of why the ECHR is important to you as an individual in a country. The TLDR was that those from the Hillsborough disaster were able to gain justice only by making an appeal through the ECHR process. They were being walked over by an oppressive government.

[–] Jackthelad 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's never going to happen, it's just tedious politicking.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Incorporatoon in the ECHR is an explicit tenet of the good Friday agreement. They cant pull us out without undermining that agreement, which would result in eye-watering sanctions from America and Europe.

(And also in any normal timeline - political ostracation. Although burning everything to the ground seems to be quite a popular policy these days.)

[–] lolzy_mcroflmao 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This sort of complacent attitude allows things like this to slip through though. Do be careful with that mindset.

[–] C4d 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It isn't likely to happen for a number of reasons but a big one is that the Good Friday Agreement requires that the ECHR be enforceable in Northern Ireland. What this means is that if you want to actually leave the ECHR you would either have to break or renegotiate the GFA, neither of which is likely to happen (or at least likely to happen without adverse consequence - Ireland, the rest of the EU and the USA have all said as much).

[–] Jackthelad 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And because of all this, it would likely need to go to a referendum.

Who is going to vote to remove their own human rights?

[–] AlpacaChariot 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People would probably do it to remove other people's human rights...

[–] Jackthelad 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except that's not how it works.

[–] AlpacaChariot 1 points 1 year ago

I know that, but that seems to be how a lot of right wing people think about these things. They want to take rights from the out group and think it will never happen to them because they are in the in group

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well I hope not. Wouldnt trust these morons though.