this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
275 points (97.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9683 readers
1377 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

An Ohio law would require state transportation officials to build highway interchanges every 4.5 miles — even if they have to tear down homes and businesses to do it.

That’s crazy.

The targeted neighborhood homes primarily belong to retired persons, young families, or others on a fixed income.

Of course.

In March 2023, hours before the Ohio state governor signed the new House Bill 23, State Representative Tom Patton wrote new language in the transportation budget

And done in an underhanded way.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If there's no fuckin' houses left there what's the interchange needed for?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"It's a bypass. You've got to build bypasses."

[–] surewhynotlem 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The plans have been on display for ages

[–] MajorHavoc 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"It was in the cellar."

"That's the display department."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

"It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet, stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'."

"It’s not as if it is a particularly nice house anyway."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I live nearby so I can give some perspective . The area is a large sprawl of developments between two of the biggest Cleveland suburbs. The homes that will be demolished near the highway have been there for decades. They have two nearby exits already so it's a mild inconvenience to drive 5 minutes up the road.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 1 year ago

Big box stores.

[–] DrAnthony 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course, and they are banking on the voter fatigue from the whole Issue 1 ordeal to give them cover.

[–] dragonflyteaparty 1 points 1 year ago

Damn, I really hope they don't get it. This whole thing is so fucked.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

New law same as the old law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Here around we have a few interchanges only 10km/6miles apart, which is already quite close. So basically an interchange every 5min on the motorway and 15/20min apart if you take parallel roads. But to mandate such a thing … wow.