this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
40 points (100.0% liked)

NBA

5100 readers
24 users here now

East - Atlantic
Boston Celtics
Brooklyn Nets
New York Knicks
Philadelphia Sixers
Toronto Raptors
East - Central
Chicago Bulls
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Indiana Pacers
Milwaukee Bucks
East - Southeast
Atlanta Hawks
Charlotte Hornets
Miami Heat
Orlando Magic
Washington Wizards
West - Northwest
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Oklahoma City Thunder
Portland Trailblazers
Utah Jazz
West - Pacific
Golden State Warriors
Los Angeles Clippers
Los Angeles Lakers
Phoenix Suns
Sacramento Kings
West - Southwest
Dallas Mavericks
Houston Rockets
Memphis Grizzlies
New Orleans Pelicans
San Antonio Spurs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Warriors and rival NBA executives believe DiVincenzo will decline his $4.7 million player option for the 2023-24 season, Michael Scotto of HoopsHype reported Sunday, and their expectation is Golden State's vital bench piece will be too expensive for the team to re-sign in free agency.

An unnamed NBA executive told Scotto that DiVincenzo is worth the non-taxpayer mid-level exception salary of $12.2 million.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Was he really that good this season?

[–] whoopThereItIs 1 points 1 year ago

I'm also curious as well. I didn't see much of him this past year, but rumors seem to place him as a player most teams would love coming off on the bench.

[–] bill_1992 1 points 1 year ago

Decent, could play some D and shoot some 3s, but other than a few amazing games, not really a game changer.

Honestly, I think if you're going to contend, you need players like DiVincenzo coming off the bench. The Warriors obviously shouldn't overpay for Donte, but at the same time if they retain Draymond I really don't see them attracting another role player better than Donte, especially with the hard cap.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting that they went for him and now can't pay enough for him. That feels like a minor miss on their part

[–] lvl9lightspell 1 points 1 year ago

Nah, he was always expected to be a one-year rental, same as OPJ last year. If he played well enough to be relevant he was always going to price himself out of a second year.

[–] TrippyFocus 1 points 1 year ago

Feels a bit high for him, admittedly haven't seen much of him since he left the Bucks but he was pretty inconsistent back then to be much more than an alright bench guy and didn't really standout in the Warriors games I saw.