this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8237 readers
372 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Description:

Ankara's role during the war in Ukraine is a complex and sometimes controversial one. As a NATO member but not an EU state, the Turks have continued to expand their trade with Russia and have continued an open dialogue with Moscow. On the other hand, Türkiye's military industry has supplied Ukraine even before the full scale invasion and Turkish policy has been full throated in its support for Ukraine's territorial integrity - including Crimea.

Turkish policy is complex and, to use the words of a former NATO assistant Secretary General - compartmentalised. It often involves cooperation even with potential strategic rivals, and sometimes tense and transactional interactions with general allies. In this episode I wanted to explore the nation's defence capabilities, economic and strategic situation, and see how that may have helped inform Erdogan's policy in Ukraine - and how that policy may impact the war going forward.

all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would Turkey pick a side if they can make money on both ends?

[–] BombOmOm 1 points 1 year ago

Their both-siding did fuck them out of F-35s they already paid for, and now they are having to pull strings to get more F-16s.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how Turkey would respond if a Nato ally, lets say Poland, invokes Article 5

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

As perun said in the video, they gonna put their Bajonett on their guns.