this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
99 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16270 readers
40 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Reddit, YouTube, Twitter - it seems like all companies want to suddenly shut down third party apps. Coincidence or is there something larger at play here?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You'd be surprised how many company decisions are made by CEO A just reading news of CEO B doing a thing and just also wanting to do it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I suppose, especially when there is money to be made and/or saved.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They don't get to sell as much of your attention with third party apps. It's money out of their pocket, the way they see it. The irony is they don't actually produce any content. jus tleech off those who do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I know why they are doing it, but I was wondering more about the timing. These have all been around for years but it seems recently there is a sudden push to remove third party apps.

Is there a new technology coming out, a new law, or as @[email protected] says is it just CEOs copying each other?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My personal suspicion is that it has something to do with Apple's changes around data collection - I'm not well versed in all the details but this article describes the overall changes in more depth. IMO, with first-party data collection becoming more important for Youtube and Reddit so they can sell more valuable ad space to other companies, they need to force everyone into their owned app to have the opportunity to collect that data.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

thats the nub of it.

"you must not profit from the content we did not create"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The era of cheap money that started in the West in the early 90s ended with covid, but these companies all have VC and other investors to pay back at extremely high interest rates

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Stupid. It is like someone getting mad that I can download a website and have an arvhived copy.

If something is publicly available, I get to have it.

I feel strongly about this for any art. Creators are so desparate to shove their stuff into our senses and get paid for it. No one is ever obliged to spend their time and resources on anything people make.

If you don't want someone to steal your work, keep it to yourself.

If the art actually mattered, if the message was important and necessary, it would be given away, there would be no barrier.

Anyways, the monetization system is fucked and rewards the worst people. Google will never get my money ever again.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Terribly obvious how little they actually understand what invidious is or does. I just hope GitHub has a backbone and understands how little recourse they have over what they perceive as a breach of their TOS when that doesn't even factor.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

They belatedly stood up for youtube-dl so there is a bit of hope, but it's still Microsoft we are talking about here. It's good that they have a self-hosted backup and more projects should consider moving off GitHub so they aren't at the mercy of spurious DMCA claims.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Hopefully this doesn't set a precedent, because I'm sure YouTube will try to take down youtube-dl (again) or NewPipe.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Well, fuck this people. Like youtube-dl I don't think Invidious will go down.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Is it likely that other scrapers like NewPipe will also be taken down? I'm a little afraid since I rely on it to entertain myself on my repaired older flagship phone.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hope next isn't newpipe or smarttubenext (which I use on my android boxes) what a crap show with all these big tech companies

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's less likely imo, blocking a proxy is easier than many scrappers

[–] PriorProject 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

... they don't understand that we don't use their API

I'm only casually familiar with Invidious. How does it play YouTube videos without interacting with the YouTube API?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably by scraping. Scraping is what you implement an API to avoid, its basically the client masquerading as a web browser and then extracting the data it wants from whatever the website sends out.

It's bad for services because iy involves sending much more data and filling more requests. It's bad for the developer of the client because scraping is more complex and breaks whenever they revise the website layout or anything like that.

But if you're going to pull a twitter, you get what you deserve.

[–] PriorProject 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, fair enough. Thanks for clarifying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just in case, any generic peertube instance to watch/upload/stream videos?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Peertube is a different network from invidious, if you want an invidious alternative, there's Piped

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

TilVids has pretty decent content

load more comments
view more: next ›