this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
176 points (97.3% liked)

Mastodon

486 readers
2 users here now

Decentralised and open source social network.

https://joinmastodon.org/

GitHub

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I had been spending quite some time on mastodon, but lately realized that it just isn’t for me.

Mastodon is very focused on individuals, not as much on content. I’m not saying there isn’t a need for mastodon, and I’m happy it’s there, but my main use case is contacting (semi) public figures or software-support there, which happens rarely. Curating a feed that is both interesting to me and "high quality" without being overrun doesn’t seem feasible.

Lemmy is much more focused on content. You don’t follow people, you follow topics or interests and get the things surfaced that the most people in that interest group appreciate. The discussions work much better (Twitter-like reply’s are just one huge bag of trash). It also doesn’t matter who the people are behind the content, as long as it’s interesting it will find an audience.

Just something that I’ve been thinking about. Any thoughts on this?

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I just like threaded discussion. It doesn't matter who I am, I'm just the first person in this comment chain.

Though there's been some bugs with showing context, hopefully those are addressed soonish.

[–] duckington 3 points 1 year ago

How does this post have -1 downvotes?

[–] spacedancer 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s basically forum discussion vs microblogging, and they are different types of social media. I myself prefer a forum type format because the focus of discussion is on a topic and doesn’t need my identity to be involved in. It’s also hard to maintain a conversation on a microblogging format when many people are replying to each other at the same time, unlike a forum where there are nested threads. It’s the reason I never got into twitter.

I did try mastodon because it was on the fediverse, but stopped posting after 2 weeks because I couldn’t think of anything interesting to post and it was hard to follow conversations with other people. It was also weird knowing there were people "following" me and will see everything I post.

[–] pbk 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You cannot really compare them. Mastodon is similar to Twitter and nothing more, it’s a microblogging service. Lemmy is like Reddit or the Usenet from back in the days with a nice threaded view. Many people on Reddit never used Twitter and vice versa.

This new fancy stuff is all part of the Fediverse, but that‘s a bit misleading. You can use one part and completely ignore all the other ones.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, they're two different sites, but the smaller user base makes Mastodon harder to enjoy for most people since the people they know aren't using it. That's not an issue for Lemmy because no one cares about the specific users, they just want the content and discussion. I just think it's kinda interesting how the fediverse approach works to different degrees for different kinds of sites.

[–] Heavybell 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, they're for different things. Lemmy is for discussions, Mastodon is for following creators (IMO).

[–] notabird 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These products aren't new. Twitter is not the same as Reddit. Why do people think Mastodon and Lemmy are comparable? Also it feels like an unnecessary competition. We'd better off with the Fediverse growing and maturing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Im not trying to say anyone should use one over the other, I’m glad both exists. You probably have a point that they are too different to be comparable, but for me they’d both compete for the same "social media time" and I simply get much more out of Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a really weird thing to post here to be honest and yet I think I've already seen this thread like five times. In so far as there is a Lemmy circle jerk this is definitely part of it.

[–] GreenCrush 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Following hashtags tends to help get more broad content. Yes, Mastodon is more individual focused, but sometimes that's what someone prefers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah definitely. I’m not saying it’s bad, just that it isn’t for me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good for you. Stick with what you like.

The ActivityPub protocol (the plumbing of the Fediverse) makes them interoperable and that's good. Other than that, knock yourself out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'll follow someone on Mastodon or Twitter because they post funny content, but then they start posting selfies or something and I have to decide how much of that I mind scrolling past every so often.

It makes so much more sense to follow topics than individuals.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I tried to use ivory‘s filter to limit some of the other hobbies or stuff that I’m just not interested in, but it only goes so far

[–] AllYourSmurf 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like them both. Mastodon is great when I follow hashtags and the occasional person. I also like that I can follow Lemmy posters there. It means I can pay attention to individuals when I want.

Lemmy is great for threaded conversation. Mastodon can do this to a point, but it’s not a clean and navigable as Lemmy.

Imagine if I could subscribe to Mastodon hashtags within Lemmy!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think the structured conversation makes a big difference on Lemmy

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The lack of a thread-view is just annoying. It's much easier to follow discussions with a thread-view.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Some apps do have a thread view. Phanpy comes to mind and I want to say fedilab does too?

[–] mysoulishome 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm trying to use it like Twitter where I find people and organizations to follow who are funny or interesting...but the majority of people "boost" other stuff more than they post. This gets problematic for me because you just follow a few accounts and suddenly your feed is so full you can't read through it all. I want it to be manageable... I want to follow people I enjoy reading...but I don't necessarily want to see 30 posts a day that they like. Maybe I'm using it wrong or thinking about it wrong. I enjoy some things about it and I'm happy it exists, but I'm having trouble finding a lot posts and users that I find super engaging.

I follow probably 30 Lemmy communities and scrolling through the feed brings me much more that is interesting, beautiful, funny, insightful...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are clients that let you disable boosts for certain people, ivory on iOS is one of them. But I totally get the general issue you’re having, I have the same one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can also look into kbin which supports both the regular article based content (like Reddit with subreddits) and posts (which are like tweets attached to a topic with tags).

Been finding some decent topics to follow recently

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That’s what attracted me to kbin, although I use the Lemmy side far more than the Mastodon one. I am still looking for some good follows on Mastodon.

[–] neblem 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think masto and indie/fedi microblogging makes sense for seeing the empherial now that you are interested not topic based content. (Especially on small niche instances via the local feed) its a also great way to meet like minded people and build longer lasting connections as you see more of a person via their stream than only seeing them in niche spaces. Granted many people single topic their accounts, but masto is way more personal and less influencer type accounts than Twitter was, though those accounts exist too. You can still follow topics, but that's a way of finding new people with shared interests not necessarily only deep diving in a topic.

Lemmy and topic forums in general are great at deep diving in a topic, but since you stay in the niche while you might see people frequent in that niche you really don't have those longer interactions. Some forum communities try to mitigate this by having general chat posts or chat rooms on the side.

Different kinds of social media have their strengths.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Fair point. There’s definitely advantages and disadvantages to both.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I, too, prefer topic focused content. On Mastodon I can somewhat achieve this by browsing hashtags. For me, hashtags ~ communities. This is the only reason I was able to get interested in Mastodon. Also, I enjoy sharing sharing articles etc which I find interesting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I would love Mastodon with Lemmy/Reddit-ish sorting. Purely chronological feed means I get low quality content at the top of my feed simply because someone posted something 2s with a hashtag I follow.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never used Mastadon but the way you're describing it, it sounds like they're doing what digg tried to do in 2010, and we all know how well that went for them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They’re like Twitter and Twitter (was) doing just fine. I’m not saying the format is objectively bad, it’s just not for me.