this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
75 points (95.2% liked)

Games

16686 readers
1223 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In one hand I want the Nvidia quasi monopoly to end. On the other hand it might bankrupt AMD on its way.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Be hard to bankrupt AMD when their CPUs make them tons of money.

[–] woelkchen 5 points 1 year ago

Be hard to bankrupt AMD when their CPUs make them tons of money.

And for the time being, AMD offers the best CPU-iGPU combination. Intel is still lagging behind on GPU tech and NVidia has no x86 CPU -- even though the most important patents expire in two years, I don't think NVidia will make an x86 CPU without the more modern extensions that are still patented.

[–] woelkchen 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In one hand I want the Nvidia quasi monopoly to end.

NVidia has no monopoly in the PC space. Intel + AMD combined far outnumber NVidia GPUs overall, NVidia just has certain niche markets where they dominate with high profit margins but that's not what this story is about.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If we are talking gaming (which by no means is a niche market), nvidia absolutely dominates the GPU market. The steam survey reports a market share of 75% for nvidia gpus

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They also dominate compute. There's still a lot of software that depends on CUDA.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah absolutely. Doing GPU parallel computing for many people is synonymous with using CUDA.

[–] woelkchen -1 points 1 year ago

They also dominate compute.

Yes, "certain niche markets where they dominate with high profit margins".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Consoles have had AMD chipsets for decades, and still do. Well, except the Switch.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

We are talking about the PC space here, though.

[–] woelkchen -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we are talking gaming (which by no means is a niche market), nvidia absolutely dominates the GPU market. The steam survey reports a market share of 75% for nvidia gpus

Gaming also compromises Candy Crush and Wordle which are not on Steam. The article is about a low-cost GPU, not a 4080 competitor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would claim that most people that need a dedicated GPU for gaming are using steam

[–] woelkchen 0 points 1 year ago

I would claim that most people that need a dedicated GPU for gaming are using steam

True but you said "If we are talking gaming (which by no means is a niche market), nvidia absolutely dominates the GPU market". So gaming in general which includes the massive number of casuals playing simple web games and that's what I was replying to. Gaming with dedicated GPU is a niche market compared to the sheer size of the overall PC market which has an installed base of literally billions of devices in use. So again: NVidia has no monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Intel GPU press releases are historically horse shit. No matter what the claim, they always underdeliver.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

For me and my workflow they deliver better drivers on Linux than nvidia and that's all I care about. If they can be less expensive than an AMD gpu as well then I'll probably get one

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Their Linux drivers are pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We need more competition in the mid to low market, under $150 and your only option is the 1030 that's worse than a 6 yo mid range card like the rx570.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly, at the price point you're better off 2nd hand

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I think competition is healthy, so I'm all for it. I hope that Intel throws their hat into the affordable local AI ring.

[–] Coreidan 4 points 1 year ago

“Affordable” ROFL sure thing pal

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I ll believe that when me shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbert...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How good do Intel GPUs work with (Arch) Linux?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Pretty well I reckon. Intel is very proactive in upstreaming their graphics drivers. Just make sure you're on a recent kernel with up to date Mesa libraries. Their OpenGL drivers aren't very fast for gaming, but Zink on Vulkan apparently runs well according to Phoronix

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I welcome more competition in the GPU space. Intel is also doing a good job contributing to Mesa.