Flippanarchy

In my area, the social structures to constructively or destructively use violence are missing; leaving only a small minority of people looking for a fight. And often they fail to meet up with others looking also for a fight: leading to quiet nights of introspection.

And I don’t think this is going to change. Which is going to frustrate a lot of people up and down the political spectrum. At the same time I think that this is for the good. It keeps people safe

Anyone remember how the Syrian civil war started ? Most of the idealistic people who liked fighting were gone after a few months.

Basically a neurological take on the age old "the ends can never justify the means" take.

I think defining terms is ineffective. Kinda like "state's rights". State's rights to do what? Focus on the actual bad shit going on instead baffling people with fancy words that can be twisted or misused later. If someone says "people aren't dumb enough to chase the high they get from seeking righteous justices by doing whatever is easiest such as attacking those closest to them" then you can go into a speech about how it happens so often that there are papers on it and it got its own term.

Focus on the actual harm being done to people. Adding terms creates a layer of distance, and opportunity to distract the conversation and waste time debating the term instead of the actual problem.