this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
126 points (95.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

30562 readers
1292 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PixelAlchemist 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think I’d prefer if they didn’t, tbh. I really enjoy seeing the actors transform into the character they’re portraying without looking exactly like them. I understand the appeal of immersion, but it would kind of rob the film of having its own character.

[–] Holyhandgrenade 6 points 2 years ago

I recognized at least 20 actors in Oppenheimer, but that didn't impact my immersion at all because they did such a phenomenal job. I don't think deepfaking the real Oppenheimer's face onto Cillian Murphy would've made a difference.

[–] AndreyAsimow 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everyday Joes and Jaynes are less attractive than a movie start whose job is to always look good and act accordingly.

However, I can definitely see the future of movies like how you described.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why not? You've got an AI generated image allready, why not touch it up a little, like you would with a photoshopped super model, to make the person look a little more appealing.

[–] AndreyAsimow 6 points 2 years ago

the main actor might look exactly like the person the film is based of.

That is why

[–] jeffw 6 points 2 years ago

Not if the Hollywood unions get their way

[–] tungah 6 points 2 years ago

Prepare for the deep fake remake of all the biopics ever made.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Bold of you to assume there will still be an actor involved.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Slightly less soon, the totally artificial simulation will look just like the subject, no actor necessary..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Beauty not being nigh mandatory for lead roles could be interesting. Deep fakes could mean that it doesn't matter how the actor looks at all.