this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
8 points (100.0% liked)

Elite Dangerous

1010 readers
31 users here now

Elite Dangerous related community. Tips and Tricks about the game.

1.) No NSFW content 2.) Don't fly without rebuy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What do yall think of Trailblazers so far? I've just built my first colony, and I really like it so far. I dont even mind the grind... until the CMM composites come into play. Hopefully they buff them again, cuz even with the buff, its really annoying to go some place and pick up like 70 CMMs when I need 5000.

Im gonna try and make my colony a refinery based colony, and build cmms for myself and others in my sector.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uid0gid0 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Is there anything out by Colonia? I moved all my stuff there like a year ago and haven't really played since.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur 3 points 16 hours ago

No for now colonization can only be done from bubble systems and systems that where created by CMDRs. You have 16ly range

[–] EyIchFragDochNur 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Started my outpost yesterday and already got it to 81%. That's really not too hard for ED standards. As far a I got it we won't have time pressure after the first one .

We have to wait until the weekly tick to have it fully operational or am I wrong?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

I think its 24 hours, but im not sure

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Pretty much the same, although I haven't built my colony yet because I work weekends. Seen some FCs selling CMMs for up to 500k each, which seems a little excessive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I always see that as outrageous price gouging on cmms, id rather help other with colonizing. I've been thinking abouy starting an organization dedicated to assisting with colonization, somethin like the Fuel Rats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Oh I agree, that was intentional understatement.