this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
71 points (98.6% liked)

Linux

49893 readers
1100 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
71
AMD vs Nvidia (self.linux)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by user_naa to c/[email protected]
 

I am going to buy a new graphics card and can't choose between Nvidia and AMD. I know that Nvidia has bad reputation in Linux community but how really it works? And I heard recently their drivers got better. What can you recommend?

P. S. I don't want any proprietary drivers (so I am talking about Nouveau or any other FOSS Nvidia driver if it exists)

(page 2) 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're on Linux AMD is clearly superior because NVidia has Linux performance issue compared to Windows so you're ending up paying more for less. However NVidia has the monopole for a reason their product are superior but at what price ? Also if you want to avoid proprietary drivers AMD gets the win too.

I do think AMD is the better option for anyone that spend less than 800-1'000$ on a GPU even for Windows gamers. Personnaly I have made the switch from NVidia to AMD 2 years after ditching Windows for Linux, Never looked back even though Cyberpunk2077 looks amazing on NVidia RTX and some other things.

I have upgraded last year to a RX 7800 XT and have no regrets on spending that money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if( you need CUDA ){ Use Nvidia (note that OSs officially supported by CUDA often use "old" versions of linux, like Debian 12 (6.1) or Fedora 39 (6.8), I personally use Arch); } else { Use AMD, you will have less problems and it'll probably be easier to setup; }

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Why are you avoiding proprietary drivers? Will using them damage you in some way?

Until Intel and AMD figure out a way to deliver feature parity, the only factor is choosing a card should be "does it do the thing I need?". An example use-case for me is having CUDA cores for Blender renders.

I've been using Linux for 30 years, and (notwithstanding laptops that only had CPU graphics) I've used nVidia cards the entire time. I get the driver's from APT, and never had any issues.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (11 children)

AMD. Unless you need blender.

Edit: to make my point clear. To some religiose like venting below.

Nothing I said says don't use amd on blender.

I said AMD unless you need blender. IE for everything but blender use AMD for blender their is a need to consider both.

As others have pointed out. The software development history of blender means for certain tasks nvidia is much faster. And will be for the foreseeable future.

If you need blender then the choice is more complex then just amd.

A do not really do anything gpu intensive other then blender. So for me nvidia even with their drivers makes sense.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›