this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
315 points (98.5% liked)

PC Gaming

9281 readers
978 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I want to add, this was an existing ruling, they just clarified the rule. Every article it seems is using each-others clickbait titles(the linked article even references it in the edit).

The change that they made was that they added a dedicated section to the developer guidelines, where before they only had it on their pricing page.

This rule has been in effect for 5 years now according to steamdb.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Who the hell would force ads on a pc game.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Along a laundry list of bad companies there's runescape fucking RUNESCAPE of all games!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago

I sounds like a joke, but they've had the cycle of
1: release controversial change to get more money
2: get protests/boycotts of people stopping their membership (subscription)
3: make an 'agreement' that still gets them more money but is mild enough that protests won't meaningfully continue
4: wait a few months for people to cool off
5: repeat

I think this 'cycle' was a lot more violent this time because it was made by a parent company rather than Jagex themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

A lot of people 😆

[–] SpaceNoodle 33 points 1 day ago
[–] 7355608 25 points 1 day ago

EA. Microsoft. Sony. They all already have product placement similar to movies in their games. Anything to make a buck, except make good games.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Whatever happens on mobile has ended up being adopted onto traditional gaming platforms down the line. My first encounter with stuff like IAPs was on mobile and lot of people's first introduction to gaming these days is mobile games, so next generation will be more open to it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

So like Fifa,Makes sense tbh.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They have game-interrupting full screen ads? Our just product placement. Because only the former is banned

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I guess not interrupting because players don’t view having to click through ads to get to the menu as interrupting

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Which game makes you click through ads to get to the menu?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago

Does it count if they are ads for things in the game I am playing? Cuz that seems to be pretty standard in a lot of MP shooters these days where every time you log in, you're bombarded with what are basically ads for new skins, events, features, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

What the other person said is what I’m referring to

though the nhl games put actual ads on the boards and pause menu that change on updates cycles

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Is it just me or is that title worded as confusingly as possible?