this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
97 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

9561 readers
2171 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] meliodas_101 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] InnerScientist 10 points 1 month ago

"Made you look"

[–] BrightCandle 19 points 1 month ago

What I don't understand is why Intel was willing to lie so extensively. They knew they were going to get found out in a matter of months and that would do enormous damage to their brand. After the failures of 13th and 14th gen processors they weren't likely to be believed anyway. It makes no sense.

[–] Coreidan 17 points 1 month ago

Who cares. Buy AMD if you’re interested in quality. Intel fell off years ago and it is only going to get worse.

[–] quixotic120 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Technically ‘up to’ includes situations that do not improve or worsen performance” - some guy who works in advertising

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

There must be at least one scenario where it's improved 26%, otherwise it's a lie.