I swear all of these agencies just pulled these all out after years of conflicts knowing that they won't have to actually work on it. They get both the credit for "trying" and the ease of not doing a fucking thing to make a difference for the people.
We have got to find a system that does not promote sociopathy for leaders and representation, there has to be something godamnit. We have computers in every pocket.
What can we do?
there has to be something godamnit. We have computers in every pocket.
So I read this book and basically it's of the opinion that democracy is limited by the efficiency of the technologies it's built upon (human representatives and paper ballots – ie. low bandwidth, passive forms of representation), and those are currently stuck in the 19th century, in all global democracies. The authors suggest that upgrading democracy to achieve the same goals but with modern technologies would make for a much more responsive and fine-graned link between people and government. (especially in the chapter on augmented deliberation)
Holy shit. This may be the most spot on recommendation based on something I've said* that* I've* ever come across. Thank you. Will be reading this.
Edits because this used to not be an actual sentence
Ikr?? I was also always convinced there must be some kind of alternative to techno-dystopia
Well done chap, did you enjoy the book? I just ordered it so I'll find out, but I figured I'd ask anyway
Yup! It's quite long but it's written with skipping in mind. I think its main value for me is that it has references to a ton of interesting fledgeling projects (many of which I plan to have a deeper look at) in one place and tries to connect them into some sort of unifying vision. I also made myself a ton of comments that I wish I could share somehow.
This will be overturned next week when the new FTC chair steps in.