Nice
Ukraine
News and discussion related to Ukraine
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³π₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
π³βοΈβοΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
πͺ π«‘ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
Would it not make sense to put 2 or 3 or even 4 antenna on it, and have it be random on which one is real and connected to power so it's less of a single target to knock out the comms?
Not really, if you're close enough to shoot off an antenna then you can just shoot the drone.
I don't get how all this stuff is not kept more secret.
With all this data you can quickly trilaterate a position.
Russia has enough smart people that they already know. Some things cannot be kept hidden so it isn't worth trying to be secret about it. sometimes you tell everyone about them so you can give different specs/reasons that throw off the others. Years ago there was a large article in Popular since about some complex ship that would allow investigation of some thing in the ocean - only decades latter did we find out while it did investigate those things, but the primary purpose was to raise a sunk soviet sub and bring it to the US.
When there is no possible way to hide it, misinformation and a plausible cover story is better.
Combined with a spotter/signal relay drone, those little guys are probably a nightmare for logistics/artillery/bunkers. What they really look like is a mobile antivehicle mines.