this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
17 points (94.7% liked)

Daily Maths Challenges

208 readers
1 users here now

Share your cool maths problems.



Complete a challenge:


Post a challenge:


Feel free to contribute to a series by DMing the OP, or start your own challenge series.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
17
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by siriusmart to c/dailymaths
 
  • Contour lines joins up points on a surface that are of the same height.
  • Field lines points towards the direction of the steepest descent.

As you may have noticed, whenever a field line and contour line crosses each other, they are perpendicular.

Prove it.

all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Eheran 2 points 4 weeks ago

Hue hue hue

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Well that's a cool one, looking forward to reading the solution later

[–] Eheran 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Isn't one calculated from the other? Surface gradient, so it is perpendicular by definition. Not sure if this is actually proven by measuring (or rather to what extent).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

The surface gradient is the part of a 3d (n dimensional) gradient of a scalar valued function (e.g. a flux vector) that remains within a 2d (n-1 dimensional) surface, i.e. without the contribution normal to the surface.

The iso-lines, however, represent the regions where the function value remains constant. As the directional derivative, i.e. the scalar product of the gradient and the tangential vector of the curve must vanish, the gradient is orthogonal to those somewhat by definition. Yet, that the negative gradient is the direction of steepest descent, remains to be proven.

[–] siriusmart 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

HintLine of greatest descent is the shortest distance between two contour lines.


I'm sure there are many other ways to solve this, as it is a very open ended question. But anyways this is one of the favourite proof i've done

Solution