this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
51 points (98.1% liked)

United Kingdom

4060 readers
58 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] guriinii 9 points 1 year ago

100?! What is wrong with these people?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

PM announces 100 new licences, claiming UK fossil fuel projects key to meeting net zero aim

Ah yes, how would they achieve net zero without fossil fuels??

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

*waves hands Infront of face*

Magic!

[–] Dark_Blade 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As the other guy said: we can’t. We still need oil to set up the infrastructure needed for a net-zero future, which means we’re still forced to use oil for a while longer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That doesn't mean we should give out new licenses

[–] Dark_Blade 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends. Will this save on all the oil wasted to ship new oil into the UK?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is to replace it in any case

[–] Dark_Blade 1 points 1 year ago

Well we’re not quite where we can replace it, and won’t be for a while. Keep in mind that oil isn’t just burnt for transportation, we use it to make plastics too. And steel. And a ton of other shit.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

How do you make steel for wind turbines without fossil fuels? How do you build a nuclear power station without fossil fuels? How do you replace all the petrol and diesel cars in the country with electric ones, without using fossil fuels? Where is all the electricity going to come from? It's complicated.

[–] ThePyroPython 7 points 1 year ago

I'm ok with this with the provision that these licences are ONLY issued to a UK nationalised energy company specifically set up to fund the green transition.

Since this is the conservative party, the chance of that is nill.

[–] doppelgangmember 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd like to take the time to remind everyone we only have like 47 years of known oil reserves anyway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we keep on at this rate, no one will want to live in the future of 47 years.

[–] Dark_Blade 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oil will become prohibitively expensive at least a decade before reserves start running dry, so we’ll be driven to net zero before that anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is already an expensive fuel compared to renewables.

[–] Dark_Blade 2 points 1 year ago

And it’ll only get more expensive. Eventually, not using renewables will be too expensive to ignore.

[–] Ultraviolet 1 points 1 year ago

How about we send actual wrecking balls through the oil rigs instead?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Considering that a LOT of gas in the UK came here by boat from the middle east, then, yes, this is actually a good thing.

Don't get me wrong, we need to get to NetZero, but the plastic parts on your electric car are made from oil...