Release builds of simple-raytracer are now benchmarked too. Release builds are slower but should still be faster than the LLVM backend.
Is the "faster, slower" here referring to compile times?
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
14 points (93.8% liked)
Rust
5767 readers
41 users here now
Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.
Wormhole
Credits
- The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yes, as far as I'm aware this is only focusing on compile times.
It has been quite a while since the last progress report. A ton of progress has been made since then, but I simply didn’t get around writing a new progress report. There have been 639 commits since the last progress report. This is significantly more than the last time given how long there has been since the last progress report.
Is this rap?
Some work needs to be done on the flow.
Nice bars though.
Release ~builds~ are slower but should still be faster than the LLVM backend.
Had us in the second half.
the resulting executables are about 20% faster and for simple-raytracer faster than LLVM ~in~ ~debug~ ~mode.~
Had us in the first half.
core::simdis fully supported ~through~ ~emulation~
Had us in the first half again.
There are still things to be done though. [link] lists things I know of that still need to be done.
You see that "though".. you thinkin'.. the rhythm.. I've broken it!
Accidentally repetitive?.. or maybe I'm just.. unrollin' it!
You go be busy.. with them sanitizers.. and tracebacks
I'll just be here chilin'.. and puttin' Rust on them maps
No but seriously, great work.
^And^ ^yes,^ ^I^ ^know^ ^that^ ^was^ ^lame/cringe.^