this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
122 points (99.2% liked)

Progressive Politics

1241 readers
477 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/24279636

[opinion piece by Bernie Sanders - goes beyond health care, gives proposals on other issues]

by Bernie Sanders
Tue 31 Dec 2024 14.59 EST

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maggoty 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We're voting for super old people anyways, we should have given Bernie his chance this year. This is a platform that would have won.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sanders decided to throw his weight behind Biden relection, helping shut down criticism of the choice at a time when it was needed. That was not the right decision - including at the time not just in retrospect.

While I have a lot of respect for him, the party needs a new generation of leaders to step up. He's 83 - and I don't mean it's time for the 65 year olds to step up. Its time the 30 and 40 something year olds step forward.

[–] Maggoty 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Sanders did that because he knew there wasn't going to be a real primary. There never is when there's a presidential incumbent. And I agree that we need the Millennials now. But we all know a Millennial won't be given a chance until the last Boomer has had their chance; even if they have terminal throat cancer.

[–] DaddleDew 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It doesn't directly involve guillotines, but I feel like they will still be required to implement those proposed changes without opposition

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

We could probably sell the opportunity to pull the rope.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 1 points 5 days ago

They'll only change through force (i.e. threat of losing profits or threat of losing their lives). It doesn't have to come through vigilante justice but I think we need to make it a lot easier to lock up CEOs. The biggest problem is that CEOs are obligated to maximize shareholder value so they can pretty much always shield themselves with that precedent.