this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
1173 points (97.0% liked)

memes

10793 readers
2470 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoneymouse 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It’s because the “algorithm” looks at the average watch time and promotes content that people tend to watch to the end, so they incentivize creating content that has some punchline at the end, or that is just so confusing that you spend the whole time trying to figure out what is going on so you’re less likely to swipe away. If your mind can easily make a judgement about what you’re watching, you’re more likely to decide it’s something you don’t want to watch, and then swipe before the end. This counts against content in the algorithm.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

If you watch the first hour of this slop you'll be numb and enjoy the next 5 hours.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"I took a picture of myself making a crazy face and pointing at an object! Will this be the engagement trap I hope it is?!"

Betteridge's law

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I've heard this law mentioned before, but interestingly in that same Wikipedia article there are several studies mentioned that seemed to conclude it's not true at all:

A 2016 study of a sample of academic journals (not news publications) that set out to test Betteridge's law and Hinchliffe's rule (see below) found that few titles were posed as questions and of those that were questions, few were yes/no questions and they were more often answered "yes" in the body of the article rather than "no".

A 2018 study of 2,585 articles in four academic journals in the field of ecology similarly found that very few titles were posed as questions at all, with 1.82 percent being wh-questions and 2.15 percent being yes/no questions. Of the yes/no questions, 44 percent were answered "yes", 34 percent "maybe", and only 22 percent were answered "no".

In 2015, a study of 26,000 articles from 13 news sites on the World Wide Web, conducted by a data scientist and published on his blog, found that the majority (54 percent) were yes/no questions, which divided into 20 percent "yes" answers, 17 percent "no" answers and 16 percent whose answers he could not determine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Watch this list, number 6 will surprise you!!!

Doctors finds that the new food that is causing cancer to everyone who eats is... (Article title cuts here, answer is nowhere to be found in the article title, introduction or conclusion).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I do this at work, because people gloss over details on really IMO emails that can affect them.

But I say exactly what it is.

Like in Slack, I go "Woah number 6 really said that our healthcare will now be decided by a d20". And then watch the conversation unravel.

[–] MITM0 3 points 1 week ago

When a "Shorts" starts with Watch Till the end for "X" & spouts a big load of Bull throughout the start, yeah it's Clickbait

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Lol my mind went straight to thinking this was some type of apocalypse trend.

[–] Breadhax0r 2 points 1 week ago

True, but that third panel kinda looks like one of those videos where they make their kitty pop and lock and those are kind of adorable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Brain dead so I wait

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I don't understand what those tiktoks have to do with the text. None of those tiktoks have clickbait titles or tags or anything. They're just silly fun videos.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Lmao it's because peoples attention spans are literally like 2 seconds.

Shits sad

[–] IzzyScissor 5 points 1 week ago

It's more so that the uploader gets the most watch time and engagement and therefore the biggest paycheck per video.

BTW, down voting is seen as engagement and prioritized just the same as up voting. Doesn't matter which button you're pushing as long as it's on the platform.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Every time I've seen people use this the thing that happens at the end should've been the entire video and/or wasn't even funny/worth watching.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›