It's only really happened the once so far. I think they're overreacting at this point...
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
446 points (98.9% liked)
AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND
870 readers
1659 users here now
This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.
② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.
④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.
⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
♦ ♦ ♦
Can't get enough? Visit my blog.
♦ ♦ ♦
Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.
$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
To some extent, yes. However, history has a tendency to repeat itself, and generally we see that there’s only so much inequality that people can take for so long. Deny them a peaceful option for change, and violence becomes inevitable.
To be clear, this is not a threat. It’s an observation, and history’s promise.
Here officer here's the guy. /s
In the US, to get what we deserve we've been killing businessmen and politicians since before the country was formed. Just a few years ago a whole mob of idiots tried to kill our Congress.
CEOs, not schools!
Well obviously they wouldn’t have to worry if they stopped putting profits over people and gave people good service and fair coverage.
So of course, they’re now demanding we pay them more via state-funded private security to protect them from further violence.
A for-profit business must put profits over people. That's why health care must never be a for-profit business.
Huh, interesting. I wonder who is paying politicians to ensure this predatory behavior is never regulated in the healthcare industry.
Could it be the executives whose primary compensation consists of company stock, which only gains value as they continue to systematically murder people by denying necessary medical care coverage? I wonder.
Ha ha, I don't think you really wonder. (:
Thoughts and prayers
Somehow I doubt that Mangione type actions will be seen as "a fact of life"