they already banned gazans being genocided; but they still call themselves a safe space?!!!
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
25 points (96.3% liked)
🦋 Bluesky Social
196 readers
11 users here now
Bluesky is a federated social network built on ATProtocol.
Useful Links:
News, discussion, and memes are all allowed here.
Rules:
- Follow lemmy.ml's site-wide rules.
- All posts must, in some way, relate to Bluesky or ATProto.
- Do not make duplicate posts.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
I saw some of those accounts and they looked like a scam. I'd seriously consider banning them on Lemmy if they popped up on my radar.
Bluesky is apparently deleting the accounts of Palestinians in Gaza under the guise of “spam.” Requests to correct this have so far gone unanswered. https://t.co/vbBfz8TFL2 pic.twitter.com/X4o7OifWlh
— Writers Against the War on Gaza (@wawog_now) November 14, 2024
In their Nov. 17 response, Bluesky explained that certain behaviors, such as gaining a large following in a short amount of time, could trigger automated spam filters, leading to account labels or removals.
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/bluesky-palestine-moderation/
I don't know if they are scams (I've not seen evidence either way) but it's very spammy behaviour - I've been followed by a couple of such accounts, despite not posting anything on there, (so I blocked them) and have seen a number of others get cross-posted that followed the exact same pattern of throwing out tens of thousands of follows but only promoting a GoFundMe page. I can't really blame Bluesky as it looks like suspicious activity, which would set off alarm bells if they did that on here.
The platform acknowledged the concerns raised by users and indicated they were working on changes to refine their moderation system and reduce unnecessary flagging.
given the transphobia that's happening right now on blueky; i would expect it to magically get fixed AFTER the genocide has concluded.
Yeah, that's a serious non-statement that basically says "we've heard you (so stop complaining) and might make some changes or we might not."
I think the problem is that their systems were right to flag up those accounts but what you actually do about them is tricky. They should really investigate to ensure that these are legitimate users but I presume the bulk of moderation is automated and checking the validity of the accounts is hard to do and would require time and resources devoted to it. So they may just feel that locking the accounts is the best approach, for them, anyway.
I don’t think they call themselves a “safe space”.