this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
112 points (97.5% liked)

World News

32550 readers
584 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago

Did someone say new settlements?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!! IT'S SELF DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

Bruh

They kicked out the dickhead dictator, another one comes strolling in.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Therealgoodjanet 7 points 3 weeks ago

I wish they were that reflective

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

This used to be called an invasion.

[–] EpsilonEridani 8 points 3 weeks ago

"We'll hold on to your land for a while, until you elect new leaders. Here! Take these walkie talkies as a gift. You won't regret it!"

[–] maniii 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Younited States of Syisrael ... maybe once Jordan is "self-defended" JordSyisrael ....

Lebajordasyisrael

then

Egylebajordasyisrael

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

ZSIS - Zionist State in Iraq and Syria

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Seeing this move should've immediately sent Hezbollah to break the ceasefire, at least if they're interested in not letting Israeli forces flank their metaphorical Maginot line by going through a neutral-but-defenseless country.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hezbollah accepting a ceasefire without Gaza meant they have been completely defeated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Pretty much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

So who are the judges, you ask? Who are they all! How to call those people, countries that invade foreign and countries, which have their own way of life, traditions, way of thinking, a different understanding of life... I want to ask

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Why do you always say: dictator, murderer, enslaver, etc. What can you theorists know about this? Do you even know how people lived under Saddam Hussein, the most developed medicine, complete tolerance of religion, there were no Islamic states, Houthis, etc., one of the highest standards of living and its quality in the region, the same thing happened in Libya during the time of Gaddafi, Muammar's state flourished and what is happening now in both states? Islamist's, states torn to shreds, complete lawlessness... Should I continue... China?! How is this not a dictatorship? And that your computers are made in China, iPhones, cars... nothing?!

Were you in Syria in 1995? Of course not and you don't know or wouldn't want to know how they lived, and they lived very well, better than now, for example, the Baltic countries, etc. Dictator, dictator... You have to think sometimes!

[–] HelterSkeletor 3 points 3 weeks ago

Tell me more about how great rule under those genociders was.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If anyone wants to know how to spot when someone has a clear and extreme bias, one can spot it very clearly in the comment above.

When someone lists a group's (religion, race, ethnicity) existence as a negative along with things like "lawlessness, state torn to shreds", you now have a firm understanding of who they're willing to dehumanize to make their points.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Before Gadaffi, the largest portion of the Libyan economy came from scrapping abandoned WWII era tanks. It was absolutely miserably poor and underdeveloped.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was there? Have you seen all this yourself?! Don't talk nonsense. Еverything was fine with them, they lived as they could and as they wanted... What now? You are the judge who gave you the right to judge.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah Gadaffi did a lot for the nation, he was genuinely a revolutionary change in Libyan conditions.