Damascus is Hamascus or something? What's the rationale this time? Because the disengagement agreement might not be enforced, Syria is free real estate?
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
76 points (98.7% liked)
World News
32602 readers
1291 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The rational is the old agreement to respect rhe borders is null and void due to the coup by the rebels. Syria is a stateless nation in their eyes and they see it as free real estate, just like you said.
Factually Israel was occupying Golan before the agreement. They do not have any legal claim to occupy Golan outside of the agreement. Their logic makes no sense in any way.
Israel:
What's that? There's people living there? We should ask them? What the fuck are you on about?
The talking point this time around seems to be that they are just destroying those chemical gas weapons and military infrastructure. Can't have that with Islamists. I have seen one person call this "forward defending" unironically.
Like the invasions and occupations of Poland and Czechoslovakia were "forward defences" of Nazi Germany, of course.
Why should zios respect borders created by the british empire when god promised them much more? God even gave them the lines of latitude. \s \s \s
Israel is an opportunistic pathogen.