this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
10 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1572 readers
77 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Data plans compared to a “tasting menu, a buffet, or unlimited soup and salad.”

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Fuck that. It costs them nothing to send data through. They are charging people on imaginary shit from subsidized ground lines that we already paid for through taxes. ISPs are as useless as Healthcare Insurers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Well, we recently learned how to deal with health insurers.

[–] AndrewZabar 4 points 3 weeks ago

It’s all greed. It’s been a while since this was discussed as far as I know, but wasn’t there talk about making Internet service into a utility and be regulated like the power and water companies? There should be a flat fee and that’s it. None of this tiered or capped bullshit. It’s alllllllll pure insatiable greed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

a few cents per month per megabit/sec (the speed of the plan) is what their 'cost' is to provide the pipe to a subscriber.

[–] Sanctus 4 points 3 weeks ago

No its not because its paid for by the government in most expansion cases. They get to lay pipe for free and charge us for the service.

[–] jordanlund 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Except that unlimited soup or salad costs the business money to provide.

Data doesn't. It's simply 1s and 0s.

It doesn't cost an ISP any more to provide the 4 trillionth 1 than it does to provide the first one.

Consuming data also doesn't deny data availability to someone else, unlike electricity or water.

If I decide to fire up a hydroponics operation and start using 4000x more electricity and water than my neighbors, that could impact them negatively. If I run a torrent farm? Not so much.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Depending on what kind of line it is and whether it's dedicated to you or being shared between you and other people, it actually can have a negative effect on other people using the service. Take cable for example, where you're sharing it with like 32 other neighbors. Another example would be 5G home internet. It works really well, but it can bog down under high utilization. But for dedicated customers such as fiber? Yeah, I don't see any excuse for this.